Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:22:28.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do birds of a feather flock together? Factors for religious heterogamy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Martin Fieder Open the ORCID record for Martin Fieder [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexander Schahbasi  and
Susanne Huber
Martin Fieder*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Austria
Alexander Schahbasi
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Austria Erlangen Centre for Islam & Law in Europe, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Susanne Huber
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: martin.fieder@univie.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social cohesion – particularly with regard to the integration of migrants – is primarily measured in terms of education, labour market participation, unemployment, income levels and poverty. When seen from a historical long-term perspective (considering the migrations of Homo sapiens in the past 300,000 years) admixture merged members of diverse groups and forged – in addition to social ties – ‘strong biological ties’ of kinship, proposing that religious heterogamy is a long-term layer of social cohesion. Accordingly, this study investigated, on the basis of more than 600,000 men and women aged 26–35 years from Austria 2001, Germany (West) 1987, Ireland 2011, Portugal 2011, Romania 2011 and Switzerland 2000, which demographic characteristics foster religious heterogamy, controlling for various confounding factors using linear mixed modelling. By far the most important factor explaining religious heterogamy was the share of adherents to an individual’s religious group in their area of residence. It can be concluded that the rate of intermarriage declines with the increasing size of an individual’s religious group in their area of residence. From a long-term perspective the lack of familial ties (and conjoint offspring) between religious groups could lead to a lack of social cohesion.

Keywords

ReligionMarriageSocial Cohesion
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 52 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 664 - 680
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, DB (1983) Why there are so few women warriors. Behavior Science Research 18(3), 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beine, M, Docquier, F and Özden, Ç (2011) Diasporas. Journal of Development Economics 95(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, PM, Blum, TC and Schwartz, JE (1982) Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review 47, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiswick, BR and Miller, PW (1995) The endogeneity between language and earnings: international analyses. Journal of Labor Economics 13(2), 246–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, H (2001) Integration und ethnische Schichtung. Arbeitspapiere – Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Fieder, M and Huber, S (2016) The association between religious homogamy and reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Socity, Series B 283(1834), 20160294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, A, Günther, T, Rosenberg, NA and Jakobsson, M (2017) Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 114(10), 2657–2662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Fortes, G, Jones, ER, Lightfoot, E, Bonsall, C, Lazar, C, Grandal-d’Anglade, Aet al. (2017) Paleogenomic evidence for multi-generational mixing between neolithic farmers and mesolithic hunter-gatherers in the lower Danube Basin. Current Biology 27(12), 1801–1810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1), 17–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jobling, M, Hurles, M and Tyler-Smith, C (2013) Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples & Disease. Garland Science, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1), 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, M, Szécsényi-Nagy, A, Mallick, S, Pósa, A, Stégmár, B, Keerl, Vet al. (2017) Parallel palaeogenomic transects reveal complex genetic history of early European farmers. Nature 551(7680), 368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, R (2010) Evaluating migrant integration: political attitudes across generations in Europe. International Migration Review 44(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnesota Population Center (2019) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 7.1 [dataset]. IPUMS, Minneapolis, MN. URL: https://doi.org/10.18128/D020.V7.1Google Scholar
Miller, WB, Barber, JS and Schulz, P (2016) Do perceptions of their partners’ childbearing desires affect young women’s pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence. Population Studies 71(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, S and Schielzeth, H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, N, Moorjani, P, Luo, Y, Mallick, S, Rohland, N, Zhan, Yet al. (2012) Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192(3), 1065–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralph, P and Coop, G (2013) The Geography of Recent Genetic Ancestry across Europe. PLoS Biology 11(5), e1001555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, D (2018) Who We Are And How We Got Here. Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN-10: 9780198821250Google Scholar
Skoglund, P, Mallick, S, Bortolini, MC, Chennagiri, N, Hünemeier, T, Petzl-Erler, MLet al. (2015) Genetic evidence for two founding populations of the Americas. Nature 525(7567), 104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ther, P (2017) Die Außenseiter: Flucht, Flüchtlinge und Integration im modernen Europa. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Thomas, JL (1951) The factor of religion in the selection of marriage mates. American Sociological Review 16, 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar